
Phyllis: Statistics About The Baby Name Phyllis
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 957 | 151 | 0.0084% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 882 | 173 | 0.0097% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 871 | 177 | 0.0098% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 852 | 183 | 0.0102% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 854 | 181 | 0.0102% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 790 | 201 | 0.0117% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 714 | 222 | 0.0135% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 666 | 237 | 0.0144% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 639 | 242 | 0.0154% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 531 | 325 | 0.0208% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 548 | 309 | 0.0197% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 454 | 406 | 0.0261% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 398 | 507 | 0.0315% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 374 | 629 | 0.0359% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 342 | 765 | 0.0418% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 301 | 905 | 0.0514% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 250 | 1,089 | 0.0637% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,396 | 0.0813% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 173 | 1,940 | 0.1105% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 154 | 2,471 | 0.1353% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 140 | 2,890 | 0.1477% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 130 | 3,251 | 0.1636% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 129 | 3,491 | 0.1723% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 120 | 3,836 | 0.1849% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 108 | 4,437 | 0.2134% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 103 | 4,684 | 0.2254% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 94 | 5,072 | 0.2458% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 90 | 5,306 | 0.2531% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 82 | 5,653 | 0.2746% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 75 | 5,685 | 0.2837% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 75 | 5,766 | 0.2897% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 69 | 5,940 | 0.3082% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 65 | 6,154 | 0.3235% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 57 | 6,782 | 0.3679% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 53 | 6,688 | 0.3804% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 50 | 7,318 | 0.4172% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 46 | 7,864 | 0.4517% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 37 | 9,178 | 0.5054% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 41 | 8,036 | 0.4992% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 40 | 6,525 | 0.4848% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 40 | 7,012 | 0.5137% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 39 | 7,596 | 0.5305% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 37 | 7,796 | 0.5602% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 35 | 7,341 | 0.5898% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 33 | 7,414 | 0.6277% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,596 | 0.6698% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,639 | 0.6695% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 27 | 7,245 | 0.6579% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 25 | 7,369 | 0.6842% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,363 | 0.6779% | 
| 1934 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,174 | 0.6632% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,103 | 0.6796% | 
| 1932 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,301 | 0.6602% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,209 | 0.6539% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,762 | 0.6660% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 24 | 7,991 | 0.6907% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,918 | 0.6630% | 
| 1927 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,422 | 0.6006% | 
| 1926 | * | * | * | 33 | 6,909 | 0.5621% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 40 | 6,484 | 0.5136% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 44 | 6,261 | 0.4832% | 
| 1923 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,487 | 0.4382% | 
| 1922 | * | * | * | 53 | 4,933 | 0.3955% | 
| 1921 | * | * | * | 60 | 4,585 | 0.3586% | 
| 1920 | * | * | * | 72 | 3,852 | 0.3098% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 84 | 3,187 | 0.2713% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 80 | 3,329 | 0.2769% | 
| 1917 | * | * | * | 92 | 2,696 | 0.2401% | 
| 1916 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,424 | 0.2234% | 
| 1915 | * | * | * | 99 | 2,092 | 0.2045% | 
| 1914 | * | * | * | 113 | 1,406 | 0.1769% | 
| 1913 | * | * | * | 123 | 1,051 | 0.1609% | 
| 1912 | * | * | * | 140 | 776 | 0.1326% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 155 | 525 | 0.1192% | 
| 1910 | * | * | * | 175 | 390 | 0.0932% | 
| 1909 | * | * | * | 172 | 351 | 0.0955% | 
| 1908 | * | * | * | 194 | 288 | 0.0813% | 
| 1907 | * | * | * | 200 | 262 | 0.0777% | 
| 1906 | * | * | * | 225 | 195 | 0.0623% | 
| 1905 | * | * | * | 235 | 183 | 0.0591% | 
| 1904 | * | * | * | 229 | 181 | 0.0619% | 
| 1903 | * | * | * | 245 | 150 | 0.0539% | 
| 1902 | * | * | * | 237 | 164 | 0.0585% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 261 | 124 | 0.0488% | 
| 1900 | * | * | * | 292 | 127 | 0.0399% | 
| 1899 | * | * | * | 272 | 111 | 0.0448% | 
| 1898 | * | * | * | 299 | 108 | 0.0394% | 
| 1897 | * | * | * | 359 | 67 | 0.0270% | 
| 1896 | * | * | * | 350 | 69 | 0.0274% | 
| 1895 | * | * | * | 350 | 65 | 0.0263% | 
| 1894 | * | * | * | 375 | 56 | 0.0237% | 
| 1893 | * | * | * | 373 | 53 | 0.0235% | 
| 1892 | * | * | * | 495 | 31 | 0.0138% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 470 | 31 | 0.0158% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 391 | 42 | 0.0208% | 
| 1889 | * | * | * | 510 | 25 | 0.0132% | 
| 1888 | * | * | * | 466 | 29 | 0.0153% | 
| 1887 | * | * | * | 533 | 18 | 0.0116% | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 506 | 20 | 0.0130% | 
| 1885 | * | * | * | 689 | 11 | 0.0077% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 538 | 16 | 0.0116% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 512 | 15 | 0.0125% | 
| 1882 | * | * | * | 725 | 8 | 0.0069% | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 919 | 5 | 0.0051% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 820 | 6 | 0.0061% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
