
Lucille: Statistics About The Baby Name Lucille
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2024 | * | * | * | 274 | 1,151 | 0.0651% | 
| 2023 | * | * | * | 285 | 1,102 | 0.0630% | 
| 2022 | * | * | * | 281 | 1,126 | 0.0631% | 
| 2021 | * | * | * | 276 | 1,133 | 0.0637% | 
| 2020 | * | * | * | 273 | 1,135 | 0.0644% | 
| 2019 | * | * | * | 296 | 1,118 | 0.0613% | 
| 2018 | * | * | * | 295 | 1,115 | 0.0604% | 
| 2017 | * | * | * | 264 | 1,197 | 0.0638% | 
| 2016 | * | * | * | 283 | 1,128 | 0.0585% | 
| 2015 | * | * | * | 283 | 1,112 | 0.0575% | 
| 2014 | * | * | * | 343 | 966 | 0.0498% | 
| 2013 | * | * | * | 359 | 869 | 0.0455% | 
| 2012 | * | * | * | 394 | 780 | 0.0406% | 
| 2011 | * | * | * | 455 | 661 | 0.0344% | 
| 2010 | * | * | * | 482 | 621 | 0.0320% | 
| 2009 | * | * | * | 570 | 529 | 0.0264% | 
| 2008 | * | * | * | 615 | 492 | 0.0239% | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 759 | 379 | 0.0182% | 
| 2006 | * | * | * | 728 | 380 | 0.0185% | 
| 2005 | * | * | * | 799 | 317 | 0.0159% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 875 | 277 | 0.0139% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 942 | 248 | 0.0124% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 945 | 136 | 0.0087% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 954 | 130 | 0.0083% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 992 | 120 | 0.0077% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 835 | 158 | 0.0098% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 737 | 203 | 0.0116% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 669 | 237 | 0.0129% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 618 | 259 | 0.0147% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 581 | 272 | 0.0159% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 545 | 300 | 0.0175% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 493 | 361 | 0.0206% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 469 | 413 | 0.0226% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 448 | 476 | 0.0243% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 435 | 500 | 0.0252% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 422 | 530 | 0.0262% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 382 | 631 | 0.0304% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 370 | 675 | 0.0325% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 336 | 792 | 0.0381% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 327 | 820 | 0.0397% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 296 | 946 | 0.0451% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 262 | 1,046 | 0.0508% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 243 | 1,141 | 0.0569% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 220 | 1,326 | 0.0666% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 203 | 1,495 | 0.0776% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 198 | 1,456 | 0.0765% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 194 | 1,478 | 0.0802% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 180 | 1,555 | 0.0884% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 164 | 1,747 | 0.0996% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 154 | 1,852 | 0.1064% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 147 | 1,999 | 0.1101% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 137 | 1,959 | 0.1217% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 129 | 1,881 | 0.1397% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 132 | 1,977 | 0.1448% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,244 | 0.1567% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 118 | 2,310 | 0.1660% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,203 | 0.1770% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 113 | 2,266 | 0.1918% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 110 | 2,310 | 0.2037% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,474 | 0.2168% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 98 | 2,642 | 0.2399% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 92 | 2,633 | 0.2445% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 85 | 2,887 | 0.2658% | 
| 1934 | * | * | * | 84 | 2,939 | 0.2717% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,116 | 0.2981% | 
| 1932 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,645 | 0.3296% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 62 | 3,851 | 0.3493% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,329 | 0.3715% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,499 | 0.3889% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,078 | 0.4252% | 
| 1927 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,625 | 0.4552% | 
| 1926 | * | * | * | 43 | 5,763 | 0.4689% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 41 | 6,388 | 0.5060% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 37 | 6,758 | 0.5215% | 
| 1923 | * | * | * | 35 | 6,912 | 0.5520% | 
| 1922 | * | * | * | 33 | 7,147 | 0.5731% | 
| 1921 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,688 | 0.6013% | 
| 1920 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,976 | 0.6414% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 27 | 7,856 | 0.6689% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,912 | 0.6580% | 
| 1917 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,517 | 0.6693% | 
| 1916 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,238 | 0.6671% | 
| 1915 | * | * | * | 29 | 6,997 | 0.6839% | 
| 1914 | * | * | * | 30 | 5,296 | 0.6664% | 
| 1913 | * | * | * | 31 | 4,083 | 0.6253% | 
| 1912 | * | * | * | 32 | 3,751 | 0.6410% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 32 | 2,729 | 0.6196% | 
| 1910 | * | * | * | 31 | 2,689 | 0.6424% | 
| 1909 | 788 | 14 | 0.0079% | 36 | 2,189 | 0.5958% | 
| 1908 | 997 | 9 | 0.0054% | 38 | 2,077 | 0.5866% | 
| 1907 | * | * | * | 45 | 1,853 | 0.5496% | 
| 1906 | 831 | 10 | 0.0069% | 47 | 1,670 | 0.5331% | 
| 1905 | * | * | * | 50 | 1,532 | 0.4945% | 
| 1904 | * | * | * | 53 | 1,350 | 0.4617% | 
| 1903 | * | * | * | 57 | 1,192 | 0.4285% | 
| 1902 | * | * | * | 61 | 1,087 | 0.3878% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 70 | 893 | 0.3513% | 
| 1900 | * | * | * | 67 | 1,182 | 0.3716% | 
| 1899 | * | * | * | 71 | 812 | 0.3281% | 
| 1898 | * | * | * | 80 | 795 | 0.2900% | 
| 1897 | * | * | * | 82 | 648 | 0.2610% | 
| 1896 | * | * | * | 86 | 637 | 0.2528% | 
| 1895 | * | * | * | 101 | 532 | 0.2153% | 
| 1894 | * | * | * | 109 | 440 | 0.1864% | 
| 1893 | * | * | * | 117 | 368 | 0.1634% | 
| 1892 | * | * | * | 120 | 380 | 0.1689% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 141 | 253 | 0.1287% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 148 | 241 | 0.1195% | 
| 1889 | * | * | * | 152 | 208 | 0.1099% | 
| 1888 | * | * | * | 164 | 179 | 0.0945% | 
| 1887 | * | * | * | 165 | 149 | 0.0959% | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 166 | 139 | 0.0904% | 
| 1885 | * | * | * | 188 | 100 | 0.0704% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 189 | 94 | 0.0683% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 221 | 66 | 0.0550% | 
| 1882 | * | * | * | 171 | 85 | 0.0735% | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 224 | 48 | 0.0485% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 249 | 40 | 0.0410% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
