
Lindsay: Statistics About The Baby Name Lindsay
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2015 | * | * | * | 846 | 328 | 0.0169% | 
| 2014 | * | * | * | 653 | 433 | 0.0223% | 
| 2013 | * | * | * | 685 | 409 | 0.0214% | 
| 2012 | * | * | * | 708 | 393 | 0.0205% | 
| 2011 | * | * | * | 653 | 433 | 0.0225% | 
| 2010 | * | * | * | 596 | 489 | 0.0252% | 
| 2009 | * | * | * | 524 | 573 | 0.0286% | 
| 2008 | * | * | * | 380 | 839 | 0.0408% | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 314 | 1,056 | 0.0507% | 
| 2006 | * | * | * | 263 | 1,230 | 0.0598% | 
| 2005 | * | * | * | 240 | 1,374 | 0.0690% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 241 | 1,326 | 0.0668% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 260 | 1,225 | 0.0614% | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,239 | 0.0630% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 210 | 1,501 | 0.0761% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 179 | 1,795 | 0.0902% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 169 | 1,845 | 0.0950% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 161 | 1,938 | 0.1002% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 149 | 2,086 | 0.1094% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 133 | 2,397 | 0.1252% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,561 | 0.1335% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 107 | 3,097 | 0.1591% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 88 | 3,663 | 0.1861% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 81 | 4,256 | 0.2126% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 77 | 4,484 | 0.2208% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 69 | 5,041 | 0.2457% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 63 | 5,532 | 0.2779% | 
| 1988 | * | * | * | 57 | 6,020 | 0.3138% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 49 | 6,527 | 0.3488% | 
| 1986 | * | * | * | 46 | 6,951 | 0.3774% | 
| 1985 | 989 | 86 | 0.0045% | 40 | 7,869 | 0.4268% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 36 | 8,500 | 0.4722% | 
| 1983 | 923 | 91 | 0.0049% | 36 | 8,617 | 0.4822% | 
| 1982 | 984 | 84 | 0.0045% | 39 | 8,249 | 0.4555% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 47 | 5,830 | 0.3265% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 71 | 4,353 | 0.2448% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 88 | 3,464 | 0.2012% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 95 | 3,117 | 0.1899% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 110 | 2,630 | 0.1601% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 134 | 2,070 | 0.1318% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 397 | 514 | 0.0330% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 698 | 210 | 0.0134% | 
| 1966 | 976 | 56 | 0.0031% | * | * | * | 
| 1965 | 859 | 74 | 0.0039% | * | * | * | 
| 1964 | 933 | 67 | 0.0033% | * | * | * | 
| 1963 | 797 | 91 | 0.0044% | * | * | * | 
| 1962 | 712 | 117 | 0.0056% | * | * | * | 
| 1961 | 686 | 125 | 0.0058% | * | * | * | 
| 1960 | 633 | 152 | 0.0070% | * | * | * | 
| 1959 | 713 | 116 | 0.0054% | * | * | * | 
| 1958 | 787 | 90 | 0.0042% | * | * | * | 
| 1957 | 766 | 96 | 0.0044% | * | * | * | 
| 1956 | 750 | 96 | 0.0045% | * | * | * | 
| 1955 | 664 | 120 | 0.0058% | * | * | * | 
| 1954 | 739 | 95 | 0.0046% | * | * | * | 
| 1953 | 624 | 131 | 0.0066% | 992 | 94 | 0.0049% | 
| 1952 | 714 | 97 | 0.0049% | 804 | 127 | 0.0067% | 
| 1951 | 681 | 105 | 0.0055% | 854 | 110 | 0.0060% | 
| 1950 | 692 | 98 | 0.0054% | 805 | 117 | 0.0067% | 
| 1949 | 872 | 62 | 0.0035% | 980 | 84 | 0.0048% | 
| 1948 | 839 | 66 | 0.0037% | * | * | * | 
| 1947 | 893 | 61 | 0.0033% | * | * | * | 
| 1946 | 881 | 56 | 0.0034% | * | * | * | 
| 1945 | 908 | 50 | 0.0037% | * | * | * | 
| 1943 | 951 | 50 | 0.0035% | * | * | * | 
| 1938 | 946 | 45 | 0.0040% | * | * | * | 
| 1937 | 962 | 43 | 0.0039% | * | * | * | 
| 1936 | 934 | 44 | 0.0041% | * | * | * | 
| 1934 | 997 | 42 | 0.0040% | * | * | * | 
| 1928 | 929 | 53 | 0.0047% | * | * | * | 
| 1925 | 979 | 49 | 0.0043% | * | * | * | 
| 1924 | 970 | 53 | 0.0045% | * | * | * | 
| 1920 | 907 | 58 | 0.0053% | * | * | * | 
| 1917 | 974 | 45 | 0.0047% | * | * | * | 
| 1916 | 992 | 42 | 0.0045% | * | * | * | 
| 1914 | 893 | 38 | 0.0056% | * | * | * | 
| 1913 | 958 | 27 | 0.0050% | * | * | * | 
| 1910 | 967 | 12 | 0.0058% | * | * | * | 
| 1909 | 931 | 11 | 0.0062% | * | * | * | 
| 1907 | 969 | 9 | 0.0057% | * | * | * | 
| 1905 | 882 | 9 | 0.0063% | * | * | * | 
| 1904 | 670 | 13 | 0.0094% | * | * | * | 
| 1903 | 761 | 10 | 0.0077% | * | * | * | 
| 1902 | 836 | 9 | 0.0068% | * | * | * | 
| 1900 | 667 | 15 | 0.0092% | * | * | * | 
| 1899 | 687 | 10 | 0.0087% | * | * | * | 
| 1897 | 899 | 7 | 0.0057% | * | * | * | 
| 1895 | 658 | 11 | 0.0087% | * | * | * | 
| 1893 | 397 | 21 | 0.0173% | * | * | * | 
| 1891 | 914 | 6 | 0.0055% | * | * | * | 
| 1890 | 554 | 13 | 0.0109% | * | * | * | 
| 1889 | 655 | 10 | 0.0084% | * | * | * | 
| 1888 | 787 | 8 | 0.0062% | * | * | * | 
| 1885 | 890 | 6 | 0.0052% | * | * | * | 
| 1884 | 682 | 9 | 0.0073% | * | * | * | 
| 1882 | 680 | 9 | 0.0074% | * | * | * | 
| 1881 | 679 | 8 | 0.0074% | * | * | * | 
| 1880 | 782 | 7 | 0.0059% | * | * | * | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
